JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 4, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de adición o complementación del Auto 419/20, mediante el cual se rechazó el recurso de súplica formulado en contra de los Autos 270 y 352 de 2020, por resultar improcedente tal impugnación cuando se formula sobre providencias que deciden solicitudes de nulidad o de adición y complementación, por ser únicamente un medio de impugnación contra la decisión que rechaza la demanda de inconstitucionalidad.

La Corte RECHAZA la petición formulada, por resultar manifiestamente improcedente y porque el actor no asumió la carga argumentativa de explicar cuáles fueron los asuntos no resueltos que debían ser objeto de pronunciamiento, en los términos y finalidades del artículo 287 del Código General del Proceso.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR, por manifiestamente improcedente, la solicitud de adicion o complementacion del Auto 419 de 2020, formulada por el senor Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.